|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Evaluation techniques in family planning. |
| IPPF Medical Bulletin 2(5): 4. 1968. |
| What proved to be a lively yet highly technical conference on the assessment of the acceptance and use- |
| effctiveness of family planning methods was held in Bangkok last June by ECAFE on the initiative of Dr. C. |
| Chandrasekaran, the regional demographic adviser. The meeting was attended by a strong contingent of |
| demographers, sociologists and statisticans from the USA and by workers from Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, |
| Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand. There were representatives of FAO, WHO and |
| the Population Division of the UN. The conference considered and debated a wide range of issues involved in |
| evaluation, from the definition of terms to detailed procedures in the calculation of indices and the detection of |
| fertility trends. A certain amount of new ground was broken with the introduction of the concept of "extended use- |
| effectiveness" (the study of pregnancy rates among acceptors of a method beyond the point of discontinuance) and |
| the presentation of new methods of calculating births prevented by contraceptive use. Some progress was made |
| towards laying down standards for the frequency of performance of surveys, both of K.A.P. in populations at large, |
| and of contraceptive continuance and event-rates among acceptors. Attention was given to the special problems of |
| evaluation presented by oral contraceptives, and by data on abortions and sterilizations. The proven usefulness of |
| the life-table method of studying use-effectiveness was reaffirmed, and work on refining this now basic tool of |
| evaluation was reported. A number of quite different schemes of data collection and processing for study of the |
| characteristics of acceptors was described, and it was accepted by the participants that, although as much |
| standardization as possible was desirable, each programme must make its own selection from the range of |
| possibilities in the light of specific conditions. In addition to the main lines of analysis of use-effectiveness and |
| programme effectiveness, the conference spent some time on discussion of such subjects as cost analysis, |
| sensitive indices of fertility change, and the use of models in connection with programme study and evaluation. The |
| specific evaluation needs and procedures of a number of countries in the ECAFE region were described. Although |
| the conference fell far short of providing a comprehensive and agreed set of rules for the evaluation of family planning |
| programmes. Indeed this was not its objective it admirably performed the function of acquainting theoretical and |
| practical workers with each other's problems, and ensuring that all concerned were brought up-to-date on the |
| progress being made in the region in the development and use of evaluation tools. (PubHealth.info Document ID: |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Evaluation techniques in family planning.", is(are) . The |
| source of this article is "IPPF Medical Bulletin 2(5): 4. 1968.". This article was published in 1968 in English |
| language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT9T 1020-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 41020 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |