|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Evaluation of a plastic intrauterine loop in a postpartum family planning |
| PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS. 1968;83(2):119-26. |
| The large size D plastic IUD was included in the methods offered by the Emory University Family Planning Program |
| established at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1964. A random 20% sampling of all women whohad |
| 1st insertions of the loop between September 1961 and November 1965 was studied for its acceptability and |
| effectiveness. All the women were low-income and at least 6 weeks postpartum. The only contraindications were |
| active pelvic inflammatory disease, a history of undiagnosed menstrual disorder, and pregnancy. Demographic |
| characteristics of the women are tabulated. All removal and retention rates are graphed cumulatively. Pregnancy |
| rates per 100 first insertions were 3.2 +/- 1.1, expulsion rates were 15.1 +/- 2.2, net removal rates for medical reasons |
| were 17.4 +/- 2.3, and net removal rates for irrelevant reasons were 5.5 +/- 2.2. These figures resulted in a cumulative |
| continuation rate at 1 year post-insertion of 63.8 +/- 2.9 per 100 first insertions. This rate actually understates |
| effectiveness because reinsertion followed expulsion in many instances. In any case, the continuation rate for the |
| IUD was higher than the 51% for orals in the same population. The youthful age and the time of insertion |
| (postpartum) favored a higher expulsion rate in this population. Even though postpartum insertion may result in a |
| higher expulsion rate, it is concluded that the benefits outweigh this disadvantage. The IUD is the most effective |
| method of birth control for this population. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT9T 1016-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Evaluation of a plastic intrauterine loop in a postpartum |
| family planning program.", is(are) Wright NH. The source of this article is "PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS. |
| 1968;83(2):119-26.". This article was published in 1968 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT9T 1016-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 41016 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |