|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Family planning: differential performance of states. |
| Economic and Political Weekly. 1973 Sep 29;8(39):1769-79. |
| The Indian Family Planning Program is critically examined, and the performance of the individual states is assessed |
| to determine if family planning performance is related to the states' socioeconomic development. Despite the fact |
| that the Indian Family Planning Program has been operative for some time, it has had little visible impact on the |
| birthrate of the country. Yet, it should not be concluded that the entire program has failed. The birthrate and the total |
| population of India might have been much greater if not for the family planning program. The major obstacles to the |
| program's success can be grouped under 4 broad categories: the value system of the people that limits the |
| motivation to adopt family planning; the social and demographic characteristics that adversely affect the adoption of |
| the family planning program; the administrative defects and bureaucratic problems that involve a lack of commitment |
| on the part of family planning staff, resulting in lack of coordination, supervision, and follow-up activities; and a lack |
| of suitable contraceptive technology for Indian conditions. In the 1st 5-year plan, emphasis was placed on the |
| rhythm method, an unreliable birth control method. Emphasis shifted to foam tablets and vasectomy in the 2nd 5- |
| year plan and during the 3rd 5-year plan to the IUD. The family planning program gathered momentum and was given |
| serious emphasis from 1965. Major administrative changes have been made in the program. It is estimated that by |
| March 1972 approximately 10 million births were prevented. The program's objective of bringing about a reduction in |
| family size and thereby reducing fertility will require a great change in the behavior pattern of over 100 million |
| couples. There are large variations in the family planning performance of the different states. Expenditure on family |
| planning per 1000 eligible couples varies from Rs 574 for Kerala to Rs 108 for Bihar. The per capita income of |
| Punjab in 1964-65 was Rs 575, compared to Rs 229 for Bihar. There are also variations in the death rate in the |
| states: from 9/1000 for Kerala to 22.2/1000 for Rajasthan. In the states with a high family planning performance all |
| have a higher proportion of population living at the higher levels of development, except in Orissa. The state of |
| Orissa has the lowest per capita income, the lowest urbanization of category 1 states, and the lowest proportion of |
| population living in districts with higher levels of development, yet its family planning performance has been relatively |
| good. Expenditure on family planning in Orissa is high, but there seems to be other factors at work which tend to |
| increase the family planning acceptance rate. Possibly a better family planning organization and delivery system |
| exists in Orissa, but it calls for a careful study to substantiate this speculation. The good performance states are |
| also more urban and have higher literacy rates and higher per capita incomes. The vital rates do not differ between |
| the good and medium performance states, but they differ significantly from the poor performance states. |
| (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT8T 82-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Family planning: differential performance of states.", is(are) |
| Misra BD. The source of this article is "Economic and Political Weekly. 1973 Sep 29;8(39):1769-79.". This article |
| was published in 1973 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT8T 82-06. All rights reserved |
| with PubHealth.info) PIN: 35082 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |