|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| A review of Family Health's latest evaluation of the demographic impact of |
| the Louisiana Family Planning Program. |
| Gettys JO; Atkins EH; Mary CC |
| Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 126(3): 81-88. March 1974. |
| The report, "Recent Trends in Louisiana Fertility," released in January 1973 is reviewed. This report was |
| distinguished from other Louisiana Family Planning Program evaluations of demographic impact by several features: |
| 1) Louisiana crude birth rates are compared with those of the United States and Mississippi; 2) differences in age- |
| specific nonwhite fertility rates in Louisiana between 1965 and 1971 are compared with corresponding differences in |
| Mississippi; and 3) the concepts of "parity components of age-specific rates" and "excess births" are introduced into |
| the discussion of Louisiana fertility trends. According to the reviewers, no scientific or even psudoscientific |
| analysis of the Louisiana Family Planning Program has ever been published or made available by the Family Health |
| Foundation to any state agency. They contend that the so-called evaluations of the demographic impact of the |
| Louisiana Family Planning Program are textbook examples of customized statistics. It is suggested that the family |
| planning program services may contribute to increased natality and that the family planning program workers are more |
| highly motivated to retain their jobs than to bring down the brith rate. The reviewers are not convinced that the |
| statisticians on the Family Health Foundation are responsible for all of the narrative that accompanies their charts |
| and tables. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT7T 3519-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "A review of Family Health's latest evaluation of the |
| demographic impact of the Louisiana Family Planning Program.", is(are) Gettys JO; Atkins EH; Mary CC. The |
| source of this article is "Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society 126(3): 81-88. March 1974.". This article was |
| published in 1974 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT7T 3519-06. All rights reserved with |
| PubHealth.info) PIN: 33519 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |