|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. |
| MARTORELLA LA; EPOSITO JM |
| Journal of Reproductive Medicine 14(4):178-181. April 1975. |
| An 18-month clinical trial carried out at the Methodist Hospital of Brooklyn, New York, compared postpartum and |
| postabortion insertions of the Lippes Loop and the Dalkon Shield IUDs. The study group included all patients having |
| an IUD inserted immediately after delivery or abortion in the hospital from July 1971-January 1973. Devices used in |
| postpartum insertions included 46 Dalkon Shields, 26 Lippes Loops, and 1 Majzlin Spring, while 71 abortion patients |
| had 53 Lippes Loops and 18 Dalkon Shields inserted. 63 of these patients were lost to follow-up. There were 8 |
| removals for medical reasons, 13 accidental pregnancies, and 24 expulsions of IUDs. The accidental pregnancy |
| rate was 9% for the total sample, 10% for the Lippes Loop group, and 8% for the Dalkon Shield group. The overall |
| expulsion rate was 16.5%, with a rate of 19% for the Lippes Loop group, and 14% for the Dalkon Shield group. The |
| parameters studied in this group of patients indicate a general tendency toward acceptance of the technique, |
| especially among younger (< 25) women of relatively high parity and low family planning motivation. If the fact that |
| 82% of the study group claimed their last pregnancy was accidental is a true reflection of patient motivation and |
| understanding of contraception and family planning, then immediate IUD insertions should be considered as |
| practical. Reported side effects indicate significant problems which, although not critical, can influence the |
| patients' tolerance of the device. Considering all of the factors, it is concluded that immediate postpartum or |
| postabortion insertion of IUDs in a high-risk population is worthwhile. However, as the object is to lower the |
| accidental pregnancy and expulsion rates, an improved type of device is needed. (PubHealth.info Document ID: |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine |
| contraceptive devices.", is(are) MARTORELLA LA; EPOSITO JM. The source of this article is "Journal of |
| Reproductive Medicine 14(4):178-181. April 1975.". This article was published in 1975 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT7T 3086-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 33086 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |