|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Natural family planning [letter] |
| Practitioner. 1983 Sep;227(1383):1350-2. |
| It was perhaps quite fortunate that your edition of May 1983 contained a book review of Billings and Westmore's "The |
| Billings method," which was generally quite positive, as the paper "Contraception today" by Dr. Rowlands certainly did |
| not give an adequate treatment to natural family planning (NFP), the demand for which is certainly increasing, at |
| least in my part of the country. There are now at least 4 quite different variants of NFP: the obsolete rhythm method, |
| the temperature method, the Billings method, and the symptothermal method, of which there are many variants. |
| However, Dr. Rowlands lumps them all together as "rhythm" giving us a failure rate "at the bottom of the table." This |
| is surely unscientific, since the various methods are quite different and have demonstrably different failure rates. We |
| are told by Dr. Rowlands that a preovulatory calculation or the use of the Billings method should be discouraged, but |
| we are then told that the symptothermal method (which does use the secretion of cervical mucus to identify the end |
| of the preovulatory infertile phase) "gives reasonable results." All trials that I know of using the symptothermal |
| method use a preovulatory phase based on a calculation, mucus detection, or both. The fact is that a number of |
| trials have now been carried out which show that the symptothermal method is an effective means of family planning. |
| This Dr. Rowlands concedes by quoting Flynn's figure of 1.1 pregnancies/100 woman-years. Unfortunately, in this |
| country most doctors and nurses do not know how to teach couples to use NFP effectively. This is important, as |
| NFP does not put the woman's health at risk and is believed to enhance the marriage relationship. One hopes that |
| there will be further discussion on this in a future symposium on Women's Health. (PubHealth.info Document ID: |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Natural family planning [letter]", is(are) Agius M. The |
| source of this article is "Practitioner. 1983 Sep;227(1383):1350-2.". This article was published in 1983 in English |
| language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT5T 2009-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 22009 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |