|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| ACLU: strict anti-abortion law could also ban contraceptives. |
| CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNOLOGY UPDATE. 1991 Sep;12(9):138-40. |
| In states that pass very restrictive abortion laws, contraceptives may be outlawed as well. A Louisiana law prohibits |
| abortion, even to save the life of the mother, and defines the moment of conception to be contact between a |
| spermatozoan and an ovum. The law carries a maximum 10 year prison sentence and a $100,000 maximum fine. |
| According to this definition, oral contraceptives, IUDs and Norplant would all be considered abortifacient and would |
| thus be illegal. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filled a suit on behalf of the women seeking |
| abortions, the physicians performing abortions, and abortion clinics. There appear to be some problem with banning |
| the contraceptives because the law stipulates that you must terminate the pregnancy with intent and if you don't |
| know you are pregnant, then you can't have intent. Thus contraceptives work without knowledge of pregnancy and |
| should not be included. The ACLU also claims that the definition of conception is not medically or scientifically |
| accepted and as such it is faulty. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT3T 2085-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "ACLU: strict anti-abortion law could also ban |
| contraceptives.", is(are) . The source of this article is "CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNOLOGY UPDATE. 1991 |
| Sep;12(9):138-40.". This article was published in 1991 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT3T 2085-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 12085 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |