|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The impact of family planning on indicators of social well-being. [El |
| impacto de la planificacion familiar en algunos indicadores del bienestar |
| Urbina-Fuentes M; Palma-Cabrera JL; Gomez del Campo A |
| GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO. 1991 Mar-Apr;127(2):153-60. |
| The RAPID computer package was adapted to Mexican conditions and used to project the population through the |
| year 2010 in order to gauge the significance of medium-term population growth for satisfaction of service |
| requirements in health care, education, housing, and employment. 3 levels of effectiveness were assumed for the |
| family planning (FP) program, which is the greatest single determinant of the rate of population growth at present. In |
| option A, the program was assumed to remain at the 1980 level, with a total fertility rate of 4.0 through 2010. In |
| option B, a relatively inefficient FP program was associated with a decline in the total fertility rate from 4.0 in 1980 to |
| 2.71 in 2010. In option C, a successful FP program meeting all existing goals was associated with a decline in the |
| total fertility rate from 4.0 in 1980 to 2.12 in 2010. In all 3 cases life expectancy was assumed to increase from 67.3 |
| years in 1986 to 73.6 in 2010, and net emigration amounted to 105, 855 persons annually. According to options A, |
| B, and C, the population in 2010 would amount to 148, 123, or 113 million, respectively. The total number of births in |
| 2010 would vary from 4.1 million with option A to 2.6 million for B or 2.0 million with C. According to option A, |
| children under 15, who comprised 44.2% of the population in 1980, would continue to account for almost 1/2 of the |
| total population in 2010. According to option C, however, 69% of the population would be of working age. The |
| number of public sector physicians required to provide 1 physician/1283 persons, the level of 1980, would be |
| 115,000 for option A, 96,000 for option B, or 88, 000 for option C. To continue to provide 1 hospital bed/1202 |
| persons in 2010 as in 1980, 27,312 more beds would be required for option A than for option C. In 2010, 21.5 million |
| children would be enrolled in primary school according to option A vs. 11.7 million for option C. 249,742 fewer |
| teachers would be required in 2010 according to option C to meet the 1980 ratio of 1 teacher/39 students. The |
| number of new housing units constructed annually would vary from 1.5 million for option A to 1.1 million for option C. |
| In 2010, 1,238,349 new jobs would be needed annually according to option A vs. 560,210 according to option C. |
| (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT3T 2063-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The impact of family planning on indicators of social well- |
| being. [El impacto de la planificacion familiar en algunos indicadores del bienestar social.]", is(are) Urbina- |
| Fuentes M; Palma-Cabrera JL; Gomez del Campo A. The source of this article is "GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO. |
| 1991 Mar-Apr;127(2):153-60.". This article was published in 1991 in Spanish language(s). (PubHealth.info® |
| Document ID: CONT3T 2063-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 12063 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |