|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| How to involve trade unions in family planning? |
| FOCUS ON POPULATION. 1991 Oct-Dec;5(4):1-2. |
| A multistage random sample of 104 union leaders in Ernakulam, Kerala, India, was conducted as part of a larger |
| study of family planning (FP) attitudes and practices in Maharashtra, Gujarat, and West Bengel. The reported study |
| was based on an earlier exploratory study in Ghaziabad. Information was obtained on religious beliefs, general |
| concerns, family concerns, desired number of children, interval between children, education of workers, charter of |
| demands, and unions working for FP. The results demonstrate that the Trade Unions are instrumental in their role in |
| FP; that the philosophy and attitude of union leaders will affect FP program; that senior leaders had a positive and |
| attitude toward FP, but plant level leadership did not always promote the same attitudes; and that unions in general |
| further the interests of workers. The acceptance of FP at the plant level is crucial to worker acceptance. In |
| Ernakulam, plant level leaders were positive towards FP, but they were negative in Ghaziabad. Both sites did not |
| include FP in the charters of demands due to the lack of clarity in the philosophy of FP among plant level union |
| leaders. The government needs to work directly with the unions in both the implementation and planning stages in |
| order to achieve the objectives of FP. Unions can take responsibility for training workers for special educational |
| programs. The current low level of cooperation needs to be increased among trade unions, government, and |
| management. Union leaders considered FP and abortion acceptable options which should be used by married |
| couples. Most union leaders agreed that FP was an effective vehicle for curbing population growth. Specific results |
| were as follows. 80% of union leaders desired 2 children, compared to 50% in Ghaziabad. 80% preferred a period >2 |
| years as an appropriate interval between births. In either study, all knew about at least one method of birth control. |
| 69% in Ernakulam and 42% in Ghaziabad had adopted FP methods. 80% in ghaziabad and 19% in Ernakulam |
| considered abortion unacceptable. 11% in Ernakulam and 15% in Ghaziabad were supportive of worker education in |
| FP. 31 in Ernakulam and 5% included FP in their charter of demands. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT3T 2052- |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "How to involve trade unions in family planning?", is(are) . |
| The source of this article is "FOCUS ON POPULATION. 1991 Oct-Dec;5(4):1-2.". This article was published in 1991 |
| in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT3T 2052-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |