|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Patterns of research: oral contraceptives and cervical cancer. |
| Sillero-Arenas M; Rodriguez-Contreras R; Delgado-Rodriguez M; Bueno- |
| Cavanillas A; Galvez-Vargas R |
| Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1991;70(2):143-8. |
| Original paper on the oral contraceptive (OC) use-cervical cancer relationship are analyzed. The purpose of this |
| study was to ascertain the biases of the original articles collected in relation to various characteristics of any |
| investigation. Papers were located by using MEDLINE, by reviewing the references of each article identified by |
| MEDLINE, and then by reviewing the contents of those journals in which an original article could be published. 55 |
| publications (from 49 original studies) were graded for quality and classified as biased or unbiased. 10 studies were |
| considered unbiased. The most common biases identified were confounding, detection bias, and misclassification |
| bias. The pattern of research/publication has changed since the association was first analyzed: articles shift from |
| gynecological to cancer and epidemiological journals and the number of studies performed by gynecologists alone |
| and pathologists alone decreases, while studies performed by epidemiologists alone or in collaboration with |
| gynecologists increase. This collaboration produced studies with fewer biases. it is thus suggested that the above |
| mentioned collaboration should be increased to improve access to and application of the results obtained in the |
| original studies on OCs and cervical cancer. (author's) (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT3T 2009-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Patterns of research: oral contraceptives and cervical |
| cancer.", is(are) Sillero-Arenas M; Rodriguez-Contreras R; Delgado-Rodriguez M; Bueno-Cavanillas A; Galvez- |
| Vargas R. The source of this article is "Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1991;70(2):143-8.". This |
| article was published in 1991 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT3T 2009-06. All rights |
| reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 12009 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |