|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning. |
| AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1992 Feb;82(2):296-301. |
| Rust v Sullivan was decided on May 23, 1991 by the US Supreme Court. The Court upheld Department of Health and |
| Human Services regulations that prohibit personnel working in Title X funded clinics from even discussing abortion |
| with patients. Even if the patient asks about abortion, they are only allowed to say that abortion is not considered a |
| method of family planning. This case sets a powerful precedent, for now the government can severely restrict |
| people's liberties in exchange for financial assistance. The new regulations significantly reverse 16 years of family |
| planning policy and make the care less comprehensive. The government has been given the right to limit services |
| and proscribe information. Family planning has a long and well defined mission and abortion is clearly part of that |
| mission. Now that health care providers can even talk about abortion, family planning has been altered to encompass |
| only child rearing, not child planning. The decision is poorly grounded because the Court has made other decisions |
| against arbitrary changes in policy made by federal agencies and departments. The old regulations are more clear |
| and less questionable constitutionally so they should not be overturned. While the decision does not affect the |
| legality of abortion, it does further increase the difficulty that poor women must face in trying to attain effective family |
| planning. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT3T 1562-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning.", |
| is(are) Mariner WK. The source of this article is "AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1992 Feb;82(2):296- |
| 301.". This article was published in 1992 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT3T 1562-06. |
| All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 11562 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |