|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The level of participation in a family planning survey using personal |
| interviews. [Grado de participacion en una encuesta sobre planificacion |
| Familiar mediante entrevista personal.] |
| Ferrera JM; Garcia de la Corte FJ; Ayala R; Lapetra J |
| ATENCION PRIMARIA. 1992 Apr 15;9(6):305-10. |
| In an effort to obtain baseline data on family planning use in the community and the population of women at high risk |
| prior to implementation of a family planning program in a primary care clinic in Spain, letters were sent to a sample of |
| women requesting that they appear at the clinic for a brief interview. This work analyzes the relatively poor response |
| to the initial letter and assesses the usefulness of this form of gathering information in a community of low |
| educational level. 271 women aged 15-19 were randomly selected from the municipal census of Benacazon, a rural |
| community in the Basic Health Zone of Sanlucar la Mayor in Seville. Women not attending the 1st interview were |
| sent 2nd and 3rd letters which also offered them the opportunity of changing the proposed time of the interview to an |
| hour more convenient for them. 24.8% of the women attended after the 1st letter. 25.1% of those sent a 2nd letter |
| and 28.9% of those sent a 3rd letter also attended. 40% did not attend after 3 letters. Reasons given by those |
| attending after a 2nd or 3rd letter for not attending after the 1st letter were work or study in 29.9% of cases, nonreceipt |
| of the letter in 22.9%, another commitment in 18.1%, lack of interest in 26.5%, absence in 6%, and other reasons in |
| 3.6%. Characteristics of those attending an interview after 1-3 letters and those not responding were compared using |
| data from the municipal census. 133 of the women were illiterate or had no school attendance, and another 63 had |
| primary school only. 19.9% of the total sample were students and 10.3% worked. Differences in age, educational |
| level, and employment between those attending and not attending were statistically significant but were not |
| considered relevant. Excluding the 45.8% of nonattenders after the 1st letter who worked, went to school, or did not |
| receive the letter, the nonattendance was believed to be due in large part to the low educational level of the |
| population and the embarrassing theme of the interview, which was not described in the letter but was |
| communicated by word of mouth in this small community. This type of survey was believed to be appropriate for |
| collecting information in a rural community. It avoids the bias of clinic-based studies which do not include the |
| nonattending population. Follow-up letters were an effective means of increasing the response rate and thus |
| avoiding the costly home interviews that would have been required to achieve a higher response rate. (PubHealth.info |
| Document ID: CONT3T 1548-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The level of participation in a family planning survey using |
| personal interviews. [Grado de participacion en una encuesta sobre planificacion Familiar mediante entrevista |
| personal.]", is(are) Ferrera JM; Garcia de la Corte FJ; Ayala R; Lapetra J. The source of this article is "ATENCION |
| PRIMARIA. 1992 Apr 15;9(6):305-10.". This article was published in 1992 in Spanish language(s). (PubHealth.info® |
| Document ID: CONT3T 1548-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 11548 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |