|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The safety and efficacy issues of progestin-only oral contraceptives -- an |
| epidemiologic perspective. |
| CONTRACEPTION. 1993 Jan;47(1):1-21. |
| Progestogen-only oral contraceptives (POCs) are generally considered a good contraceptive choice for breast feeding |
| women who want to use an oral form of contraception, but are not suited for, or cannot tolerate the side effects of, |
| estrogen-containing preparations. However, a number of POCs' safety, efficacy and other related issues remain to be |
| addressed. This paper reviews recent literature and evaluates these issues from an epidemiologic perspective. |
| The small number of users imposes severe limitations in designing epidemiologic studies to address POCs' |
| longterm safety issues, but available information suggests POCs are at least as safe as, if not safer than, |
| combination oral contraceptives (COCs). Compared to COCs, POCs are more likely to cause menstrual disturbances |
| which, in turn, could affect their acceptability and lead to poor compliance and hence higher pregnancy rates. |
| POCs' efficacy has been estimated to be between 1.4-4.3 pregnancies/100 woman-years of use. Lower pregnancy |
| rates approaching those of COCs have been reported in centers with good counseling. POCs' benefits outweigh their |
| risks. However, more studies are needed to further address POCs' safety and efficacy issues. (PubHealth.info |
| Document ID: CONT2T 4571-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The safety and efficacy issues of progestin-only oral |
| contraceptives -- an epidemiologic perspective.", is(are) Chi IC. The source of this article is "CONTRACEPTION. |
| 1993 Jan;47(1):1-21.". This article was published in 1993 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT2T 4571-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 9571 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |