|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| One-year experience with subdermal contraceptive implants in the United |
| Frank ML; Poindexter AN 3d; Cornin LM; Cox CA; Bateman L |
| CONTRACEPTION. 1993 Sep;48(3):229-43. |
| Women who received Norplant contraceptive implants from any of 15 clinical settings in southeast Texas, were |
| followed for 1 year to determine their reactions to the method. Of 1385 who enrolled to receive Norplant implants, |
| 1253 had implants inserted. Side effects were reported by 78% of those receiving implants and 70% described |
| changes in bleeding patterns. Spotting or irregular bleeding, weight gain, and headaches were the conditions |
| reported most frequently. 9 pregnancies were reported during the study period, 6 of these, however, existed before the |
| implants were inserted. At the 1 year anniversary, 143 women receiving implants had had them removed. Those |
| who discontinued method use were less satisfied, reported more side effects, and were more likely to have planned |
| to have another child, thus using the method for spacing, or to have had a change in their marital status while they |
| were using the contraceptive. Providers should counsel patients to focus attention on plans for the future in |
| selecting their contraceptive method. In addition, the authors recommend, as does the product's distributor, that |
| providers confirm that patients are not pregnant prior to inserting the implants. (PubHealth.info Document ID: |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "One-year experience with subdermal contraceptive implants |
| in the United States.", is(are) Frank ML; Poindexter AN 3d; Cornin LM; Cox CA; Bateman L. The source of this |
| article is "CONTRACEPTION. 1993 Sep;48(3):229-43.". This article was published in 1993 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT2T 4559-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 9559 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |