|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Women's satisfaction with Norplant as compared with oral contraceptives. |
| JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE. 1994 Jun;38(6):596-600. |
| In Wisconsin, 115 Norplant users and 148 oral contraceptive (OC) users, all of whom attended the university- |
| administered family medicine residency training clinic in Eau Claire between May, 1991, and February, 1993, returned |
| questionnaires as part of a study to examine satisfaction with their chosen contraceptive and its benefits and side |
| effects. Most women were satisfied with their contraceptive method (60% for Norplant users and 72% for OC users). |
| OC users were more likely to use their method again than were Norplant users (88% vs. 63%; p < .001). Even though |
| most women would recommend their method to a friend, OC users were more likely to do so than Norplant users (97% |
| vs. 74%; p < .001). Irregular bleeding was more common among Norplant users than among OC users (73% vs. 34%; |
| p < .001). OC users were more likely to feel that OCs caused less bleeding and less cramping than did Norplant |
| users (72% vs. 30% and 60% vs. 30%, respectively; p < .001). They were less likely to complain of acne (7% vs. 29%; |
| p < .001), weight gain (33% vs. 49%; p < .04), and bleeding irregularities (8% vs. 60%; p < .001) than Norplant users. |
| Overall, both Norplant and OC users were satisfied with their current contraceptive method, but satisfaction was lower |
| and side effects were more common among Norplant users. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT2T 4510-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Women's satisfaction with Norplant as compared with oral |
| contraceptives.", is(are) Eilers GM; Swanson TK. The source of this article is "JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE. |
| 1994 Jun;38(6):596-600.". This article was published in 1994 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT2T 4510-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 9510 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |