|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Public funding of family planning leads to moderate reductions in |
| underweight births and infant deaths. |
| Family Planning Perspectives. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):92-3. |
| Pooled time-series data from 50 states in the US during 1982-88 was used to examine the impact of publicly funded |
| abortion and family planning services on the following outcomes: the abortion rate, the teenage birth rate, the |
| percentage of low birth weight infants, the percentage of premature births, the infant mortality rate, and the neonatal |
| mortality rate. Data on state abortion rates was obtained from the Alan Guttmacher Institute and national statistical |
| centers. Independent variables included the abortion public funding rate, the federal and state funding for family |
| planning per capita, and socioeconomic factors, the proportion Catholic, and the percentage living in a county with a |
| large abortion provider. The impact of abortion funding was constructed by multiplying the regression coefficients by |
| the funded abortion rate. The mean funded abortion rate (4.97 funded abortions per 1000 women) was used in states |
| that did not publicly fund abortions. Every $1.00 per capita increase in family planning expenditures was associated |
| with a reduction of more than one abortion per 1000 women (1.046 per 1000). Higher funding levels were also |
| associated with 261 fewer births per 100,000 women among women with inadequate prenatal care. There were 49 |
| fewer low birth weight deliveries per 100,000 births, 16 fewer infant deaths per 100,000 births, and 13 fewer neonatal |
| deaths per 100,000 births. For each additional abortion receiving state funds, the abortion rate increased by 0.42 per |
| 1000, but one funded abortion per 1000 women reduced teenage births by 0.67 per 100,000. For every 100,000 births, |
| there were 263 fewer births to women receiving inadequate prenatal care. There was a reduction of 2.4 per 100,000 |
| births among low birth weight infants and 2.7 per 100,000 fewer premature births. In the 12 states with funding of |
| abortions for at least 1 year out of the 7 years, there were an additional 563,866 abortions, but 151,907 fewer teenage |
| births, 232,570 fewer births to women with inadequate prenatal care, 21,555 fewer low birth weight babies, and |
| 23,928 fewer premature births. In the states without Medicaid-funded abortions, there were 503,778 fewer abortions, |
| but an increase of 136,499 in teenage births, of 18,453 in low birth weight deliveries, of 20,760 in premature births, |
| and of 201,907 in births to women with inadequate prenatal care. Family planning expenditures over the 7-year period |
| reduced abortions by 670,384. The results support the argument for integration of abortion and family planning |
| services. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT2T 3041-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Public funding of family planning leads to moderate |
| reductions in underweight births and infant deaths.", is(are) Donovan P. The source of this article is "Family |
| Planning Perspectives. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):92-3.". This article was published in 1995 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT2T 3041-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 8041 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |