|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The economics of family planning services [editorial] |
| British Journal of Family Planning. 1995 Oct;21(3):81. |
| Research which provides a cost benefit analysis of the public provision of family planning services is complicated by |
| the fact that the benefits are invisible savings to future health and social service budgets. Thus, investigators must |
| decide which outcomes to include in their calculations, what economic values to attach to them, and how these |
| should be weighted for analysis. Research to date in Great Britain has used as its only outcome the avoidance of |
| unintended pregnancy. The economic benefits are savings in direct National Health Service costs and income |
| maintenance programs for families of unintended children. Two studies by Laing concluded by urging local |
| authorities to invest in FP services and by identifying an economic benefit/cost ratio of such an investment as over |
| 5:1. A recent study by McGuire and Hughes led to a calculation of a public purse benefit/cost ratio of 11:1. This |
| study showed that all contraceptive methods are highly cost-effective, including those with a relatively high initial |
| cost, and that sterilization is the most cost-effective method. According to these studies, FP costs of 159.7 million |
| British pounds in 1991 generated savings of over 25 billion pounds. Data constraints continue to plague |
| investigation comparing the cost-effectiveness of different modes of service provision. These conclusions led the |
| Contraceptive Alliance to recommend that a full range of contraceptive methods be provided free of charge at the |
| point of service provision. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT2T 2552-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The economics of family planning services [editorial]", |
| is(are) . The source of this article is "British Journal of Family Planning. 1995 Oct;21(3):81.". This article was |
| published in 1995 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT2T 2552-06. All rights reserved with |
| PubHealth.info) PIN: 7552 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |