|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods. |
| Trussell J; Leveque JA; Koenig JD; London R; Borden S; Henneberry J; |
| LaGuardia KD; Stewart F; Wilson TG; Wysocki S |
| AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1995 Apr;85(4):494-503. |
| An economic model was developed to compare the effectiveness and costs per person of 15 contraceptive methods: |
| tubal ligation, vasectomy, oral contraceptives, contraceptive implant, injectable contraceptive, progesterone-T IUD, |
| copper-T IUD, diaphragm, male condom, female condom, sponge, spermicides, cervical cap, withdrawal, and |
| periodic abstinence. All 15 contraceptives were more effective and less costly than no method. Contraceptives thus |
| save health care resources by preventing unintended pregnancies. Moreover, the initial acquisition costs are |
| inaccurate predictors of the total economic costs of competing contraceptive methods. Cost data were drawn from a |
| national claims database and MediCal, with the main outcome measures being 1-year and 5-year costs and the |
| number of pregnancies avoided compared with the use of no contraceptive method. Over five years, the copper-T |
| IUD, vasectomy, the contraceptive implant, and the injectable contraceptive were the most cost-effective saving, |
| $14,122, $13,899, $13,813, and $13,373, respectively, and preventing approximately the same number of |
| pregnancies per person, 4.2. Oral contraceptives cost $1784 over five years, saved $12,879, and prevented 4.1 |
| pregnancies. The high failure rates of barrier methods, spermicides, withdrawal, and periodic abstinence were |
| costly, but still saved $8933-12,239 over five years. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT2T 2551-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 |
| methods.", is(are) Trussell J; Leveque JA; Koenig JD; London R; Borden S; Henneberry J; LaGuardia KD; |
| Stewart F; Wilson TG; Wysocki S. The source of this article is "AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1995 |
| Apr;85(4):494-503.". This article was published in 1995 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT2T 2551-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 7551 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |