|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of |
| Trussell J; Koenig J; Ellertson C; Stewart F |
| AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1997 Jun;87(6):932-7. |
| An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills, progestin-only minipills, and the copper-T |
| IUD indicated all three are cost-effective interventions, whether provided when an emergency occurs or in advance for |
| use as needed should unprotected intercourse take place. The cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception |
| depends on three factors: the cost of treatment, the probability of its preventing an unintended pregnancy, and the |
| cost of an unintended pregnancy. Cost data were computed for two US treatment settings: private managed care and |
| publicly funded programs. A 74% reduction in unintended pregnancies was assumed based on data from 10 |
| clinical trials of the effectiveness of emergency contraception. In a managed care setting, a single treatment of |
| emergency contraception after unprotected intercourse saves $142 when emergency contraceptive pills are used and |
| $119 with minipills; in a public payer setting, these savings are $54 and $29, respectively. The copper-T IUD is not |
| cost-effective as an emergency method alone; however, savings exceed costs in both settings when IUD use |
| continues for only 4 months. Advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills to women using barrier methods, |
| spermicides, withdrawal, or periodic abstinence would save $263-498 in the private sector and $99-205 in the public |
| sector annually. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT2T 1004-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of |
| three methods of emergency contraception.", is(are) Trussell J; Koenig J; Ellertson C; Stewart F. The source of |
| this article is "AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. 1997 Jun;87(6):932-7.". This article was published in |
| 1997 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT2T 1004-06. All rights reserved with |
| PubHealth.info) PIN: 6004 |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |