|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Comparison of vaginal and oral administration of emergency contraception. |
| Mor E; Saadat P; Kives S; White E; Reid RL |
| Fertility and Sterility. 2005 Jul;84(1):40-45. |
| Objective: To compare the physiologic effects of vaginally and orally administered emergency contraception. Design: |
| Prospective, open-label, crossover study. Setting: University research center. Patient(s): Nine regularly menstruating |
| volunteers. Intervention(s): Five subjects received 1,000 µg of levonorgestrel with 200 µg of ethinyl E(-2)(twice the |
| standard Yuzpe regimen dose) vaginally, and the standard Yuzpe regimen dose orally 1 week later. Four subjects |
| received 1,500 µg of levenorgestrel (twice the standard Plan B regimen dose) vaginally and received the standard |
| Plan B dose orally 1 week later. Serum samples were obtained at baseline an at frequent intervals after each dose. |
| Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels measured at baseline, at the |
| time of peak levonorgestrel, and 24 hours later. Result(s): Gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels were |
| suppressed to a similar degree among the four regimens, with a return to baseline levels after 24 hours. |
| Conclusion(s): We conclude that high doses of levonorgestrel found in emergency contraception regimens lead to a |
| transient direct suppression of gonadotropin, hepatic globulin, and androgen levels. This effect is similar after |
| vaginal and oral administration of emergency contraception. Therefore, the vaginal route of administration of |
| emergency contraception regimens may be as efficacious as the oral route. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT1T |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Comparison of vaginal and oral administration of |
| emergency contraception.", is(are) Mor E; Saadat P; Kives S; White E; Reid RL. The source of this article is |
| "Fertility and Sterility. 2005 Jul;84(1):40-45.". This article was published in 2005 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 90-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 90 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |