|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral density in healthy |
| pre-menopausal women. [Anillo anticonceptivo vaginal combinado y densidad |
| mineral ósea en mujeres premenopáusicas sanas.] |
| Massai R; Mäkäräinen L; Kuukankorpi A; Klipping C; Duijkers I |
| Human Reproduction. 2005 Oct;20(10):2764-2768. |
| Hormonal contraceptives have been associated with various effects on the bone mineral density (BMD) of pre- |
| menopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a vaginal contraceptive ring on BMD in pre- |
| menopausal women and compare them with those of non-hormonal contraceptive use. This open-label, multicentre |
| study used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure BMD in the lumbar spine (L/2-L/4) and femoral neck regions. |
| Subjects were assigned 3:1 to receive a contraceptive ring (n = 105) or a non-hormonal contraceptive control (n = 39) |
| and were assessed after 13 and 26 cycles of contraceptive ring treatment or 12 and 24 months of control treatment. |
| No change from baseline in BMD (Z-scores) was seen in contraceptive ring users (n = 73) at either time-point. In the |
| control group (n = 30), BMD increased slightly from baseline resulting in significant differences (P < 0.0001) between |
| the two groups at cycle 26/month 24. These differences are not clinically relevant, although some degree of |
| acquisition of peak bone mass might have been prevented in the contraceptive ring group. The contraceptive ring |
| was generally well tolerated; a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events was observed in the |
| contraceptive ring group compared with the non-hormonal contraceptive control group. In healthy pre-menopausal |
| women, 2 years of contraceptive ring use produced no changes in BMD. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT1T 82- |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "The combined contraceptive vaginal ring and bone mineral |
| density in healthy pre-menopausal women. [Anillo anticonceptivo vaginal combinado y densidad mineral ósea en |
| mujeres premenopáusicas sanas.]", is(are) Massai R; Mäkäräinen L; Kuukankorpi A; Klipping C; Duijkers I. The |
| source of this article is "Human Reproduction. 2005 Oct;20(10):2764-2768.". This article was published in 2005 in |
| English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 82-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 82 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |