|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Association between the current use of low-dose oral contraceptives and |
| cardiovascular arterial disease: a meta-analysis. |
| Baillargeon JP; McClish DK; Essah PA; Nestler JE |
| Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005 Jul;90(7):3863-3870. |
| The long-term cardiovascular safety of widely used oral contraceptives (OCs) is still debated, and no meta-analysis |
| assesses the modern use of OCs and the associated cardiovascular risks. We aimed to assess the risk of |
| cardiovascular diseases associated with current use of low-dose combined OCs. All studies published between |
| January 1980 and October 2002 were searched using MEDLINE, BIOSIS, and Scientific Citations. Original studies |
| were selected independently by two investigators (J.P.B., P.A.E.) based on inclusion criteria: low-dose combined OC |
| (< 50 µg of ethinyl-estradiol); more than 10 cases in low-dose users; clear definition of cases; concurrent controls; |
| and control for age. A third investigator (J.E.N.) adjudicated disagreements. From 2715 identified articles, 14 |
| independent studies were included. All data were abstracted by one investigator (J.P.B.) in a systematic manner. |
| Classification of OCs and types of exposure were directly abstracted from studies. Current use was defined as use at |
| the time of the event or within 3 months. Only peer-reviewed studies with definition of events as definite or possible, |
| based on prespecified criteria, were included. The summary risk estimates associated with current use of low-dose |
| OCs were 1.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.38, 2.44] for myocardial infarctions and 2.12 (95% CI =1.56, 2.86) for |
| ischemic strokes. The overall summary odds ratio for both outcomes was 2.01 (95% CI =1.63, 2.48). Second |
| generation OCs were associated with a significant increased risk of both myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke |
| events [1.85 (95% CI =1.03, 3.32) and 2.54 (95% CI_1.96, 3.28), respectively]; and third-generation OCs, for ischemic |
| stroke outcome only [2.03 (95% CI =1.15, 3.57)]. In conclusion, a rigorous meta-analysis of the literature suggests |
| that current use of low-dose OCs significantly increases the risk of both cardiac and vascular arterial events, |
| including a significant risk of vascular arterial complications with third generation OCs. (PubHealth.info Document |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Association between the current use of low-dose oral |
| contraceptives and cardiovascular arterial disease: a meta-analysis.", is(are) Baillargeon JP; McClish DK; Essah |
| PA; Nestler JE. The source of this article is "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2005 |
| Jul;90(7):3863-3870.". This article was published in 2005 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: |
| CONT1T 67-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 67 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |