|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Mind the gap: responding to the global funding crisis in family planning. |
| Gribble JN; Jennings V; Nikula M |
| Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2004 Jul;30(3):155-157. |
| The widening gap between the cost of meeting family planning needs and the funding available for commodities and |
| programmes is a concern among policymakers and reproductive health professionals. The gap could reach US$210 |
| million by 2015. Its causes are clear; its solutions are not. While changes in programme method mix and cost |
| shifting could address this gap, an often over-looked alternative is the development and introduction of effective, low- |
| cost methods. The Standard Days Method (SDM) has a first-year failure rate of only 4.8 (correct use) and is |
| acceptable to many women around the world. It is easily integrated into programmes. Many SDM users rely on |
| CycleBeads to help identify the days when pregnancy is likely. Though already meeting couples' needs in many |
| places, the SDM responds in a unique way to needs in settings with high use of traditional methods, high levels of |
| unmet need, and chronic depletion of commodities. The donor gap could have negative consequences, but it also |
| facilitates reassessing family planning programme policies to include other effective, low-cost methods. |
| (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT1T 589-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Mind the gap: responding to the global funding crisis in |
| family planning.", is(are) Gribble JN; Jennings V; Nikula M. The source of this article is "Journal of Family Planning |
| and Reproductive Health Care. 2004 Jul;30(3):155-157.". This article was published in 2004 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 589-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 589 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |