|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Manipulation of the pill-free interval in oral contraceptive pill users: the |
| effect on follicular suppression. |
| Schlaff WD; Lynch AM; Hughes HD; Cedars MI; Smith DL |
| American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004 Apr;190(4):943-951. |
| The purpose of this study was to compare follicular suppression that was produced by 3 different oral contraceptive |
| regimens that differ by treatment in the pill-free interval. In a university setting, 54 women were assigned randomly to |
| receive either 20 µg ethinyl estradiolC100 mg levonorgestrel followed by 7 pill-free days, 20 µg ethinyl estradiol + 150 |
| µg desogestrel followed by 2 days of placebo then 10 µg ethinyl estradiol for 5 days, or 28 days of 20 µg ethinyl |
| estradiol plus 150 µg desogestrel. Follicular suppression was evaluated by serial ultrasound scans and by serum |
| and urinary hormone levels during a 2-month study period. Data were analyzed by nonparametric statistical tests. |
| There was a significant difference in follicle count among the 3 groups (P=.005). Women who were treated with a 7- |
| day pill-free interval experienced the least suppression. Estrogen levels were more variable and led to an observation |
| that overweight (body mass index, >25 kg/m²) was associated with reduced follicle suppression (relative risk, 1.6; |
| 95% CI, 1.0, 2.7) and higher estrogen levels (relative risk, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3, 21). Contraceptive pill users who were |
| treated with a 7-day pill-free interval demonstrated less follicular suppression than women who were supplemented |
| with either estrogen alone or estrogen plus progestin. Overweight women were less suppressed than women of |
| normal weight. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT1T 583-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Manipulation of the pill-free interval in oral contraceptive pill |
| users: the effect on follicular suppression.", is(are) Schlaff WD; Lynch AM; Hughes HD; Cedars MI; Smith DL. |
| The source of this article is "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004 Apr;190(4):943-951.". This article |
| was published in 2004 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 583-06. All rights reserved |
| with PubHealth.info) PIN: 583 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |