|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in China |
| makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial. |
| Hu X; Cheng L; Hua X; Glasier A |
| Contraception. 2005;72:111-116. |
| Emergency contraception (EC) prevents pregnancy, and it has been suggested that widespread use could reduce |
| abortion rates; however, the use is limited. Providing EC in advance of need increases use, but there is no direct |
| evidence that it reduces unintended pregnancy. In a randomized controlled trial of 2000 women after childbirth in |
| Shanghai, all women not wishing to use hormonal contraception or an intrauterine device (IUD) were given a supply |
| of condoms. Those in the intervention group also received three courses of mifepristone 10 mg with instructions for |
| use as EC. Follow-up was by telephone at 16, 32 and 52 weeks. Over 88% of women in both groups completed 1 year |
| of follow-up. Women with a supply of EC were more than twice as likely to use it, and to use it more than once (p < |
| .001 for both) than women without a supply. There was no difference in pregnancy rates at 1 year (38/832 vs. 32/817). |
| EC was not used in 89% of conception cycles, as women did not recognize the need for it. Increased use of EC may |
| not reduce abortion rates. (PubHealth.info Document ID: CONT1T 58-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Advanced provision of emergency contraception to |
| postnatal women in China makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial.", is(are) Hu X; |
| Cheng L; Hua X; Glasier A. The source of this article is "Contraception. 2005;72:111-116.". This article was |
| published in 2005 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 58-06. All rights reserved with |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |