|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Emergency contraception: why can't you give it away? Qualitative findings |
| from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception. |
| Fairhurst K; Ziebland S; Wyke S; Seaman P; Glasier A |
| Contraception. 2004 Jul;70(1):25-29. |
| The Lothian Emergency Contraception Project (LECP)-a primary care-based intervention to offer advance supplies of |
| emergency contraception (EC) to women aged 16-29 was not associated with a reduction in abortion rates. We |
| undertook case studies, utilizing qualitative and quantitative methods, to evaluate the intervention. In this article we |
| present findings from qualitative interviews with 44 primary care professionals working at case study sites and 22 |
| women who had received advance supplies to explain this failure. Professionals reported that women rarely asked for |
| advance supplies of EC and they were reluctant to offer supplies to women because of concerns about contradictory |
| sexual health messages implied by the offer, a perceived association of EC use with chaotic behavior by women, |
| views about the sort of women suitable for advance supplies and practical difficulties making the offer. Women were |
| reluctant to ask for advance supplies because of misgivings about the appropriateness of offering advance supplies |
| to everybody and concerns about being judged by health professionals as morally inadequate. If advance provision of |
| EC is to be successful in reducing abortion rates, professionals must address their concerns about EC and develop |
| imaginative ways of encouraging women most at risk of unwanted pregnancy to take supplies home. (PubHealth.info |
| Document ID: CONT1T 546-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Emergency contraception: why can't you give it away? |
| Qualitative findings from an evaluation of advance provision of emergency contraception.", is(are) Fairhurst K; |
| Ziebland S; Wyke S; Seaman P; Glasier A. The source of this article is "Contraception. 2004 Jul;70(1):25-29.". This |
| article was published in 2004 in English language(s). (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 546-06. All rights |
| reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 546 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |