|
PubHealth.info®
(a subsidiary of
PakMed) presents scientific information mainly
based on abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health issues/topics,
particularly encompassing
population planning, disease prevention, maternal and child health,
and communicable and
non-communicable diseases (like HIV AIDS, malaria, etc) that are
affecting a significant portion of population in developing and
developed
countries. Here you can find abstracts of articles published on a variety of public health
topics under category "Contraception
(Birth Control) and Family Planning".
Contraception (birth control)
is a regimen of one or more actions, devices, or medications followed in
order to deliberately prevent or reduce the likelihood of a woman
becoming pregnant or giving birth. Therefore contraception is the
utilization of various and sundry surgical procedures, devices,
practices, agents, or drugs with the intention of preventing conception
or impregnation (pregnancy). Methods and intentions typically termed
birth control may be considered a pivotal ingredient to family
planning. Birth control is a controversial political and ethical
issue in many cultures and religions, and although it is generally less
controversial than abortion specifically. |
|
|
| CATEGORY: |
Contraception (Birth Control) and Family Planning |
| Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods. |
| Sonnenberg FA; Burkman RT; Hagerty CG; Speroff L; Speroff T |
| Contraception. 2004 Jun;69(6):447-459. |
| Pregnancy and contraceptive methods both have important health effects that include risks and benefits. The net |
| impact of contraception on women's health has not been reported previously. This is a cost-utility analysis using a |
| Markov model evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation using the societal perspective for costs. The analysis compared |
| 13 methods of contraception to nonuse of contraception with respect to healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life |
| years (QALYs). Discounting was applied for future costs and health effects. The base-case analysis applies to |
| women of average health and fertility, ranging from 15 to 50 years of age, who are sexually active in a mutually |
| monogamous relationship; smoking rates observed in women of reproductive age were used. Sensitivity analysis |
| extended the analysis to nonmonogamous status and smoking status. Compared with use of no contraception, |
| contraceptive methods of all types result in substantial cost savings over 2 years, ranging from US$5907 per woman |
| for tubal sterilization to US$9936 for vasectomy and health gains ranging from 0.088 QALYs for diaphragm to 0.147 |
| QALYs for depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Compared with nonuse, even with a time horizon as short as 1 year, |
| use of any method other than sterilization results in financial savings and health gains. Most of the financial savings |
| and health gains were due to contraceptive effects. In a population of patients, even modest increases in the use of |
| the most effective methods result in financial savings and health gains. Every method of contraception dominates |
| nonuse in most clinical settings. Increasing the use of more effective methods even modestly at the expense of less |
| effective methods will improve health and reduce costs. Methods that require action by the user less frequently than |
| daily are both less costly and more effective than methods requiring action on a daily basis. (PubHealth.info |
| Document ID: CONT1T 518-06) |
| PubHealth.info NOTE: The author(s) of this article titled, "Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods.", |
| is(are) Sonnenberg FA; Burkman RT; Hagerty CG; Speroff L; Speroff T. The source of this article is |
| "Contraception. 2004 Jun;69(6):447-459.". This article was published in 2004 in English language(s). |
| (PubHealth.info® Document ID: CONT1T 518-06. All rights reserved with PubHealth.info) PIN: 518 |
| This article is peer-reviewed. |
|
|
|
© Copyrights PubHealth.info®,
an information portal on public health. All rights
reserved.
This page is optimized to be viewed by
Java script enabled Microsoft®
Internet Explorer 6 or later version, at screen resolution of 800 by 600 pixels. |